Annons

Responsible and Profitable AI: ”The Path to Higher ROI Demands Governance and Structure”

JOSEFIN ROSÉN, SAS Institute: ”In the Nordics, users choose to override or disregard an average of 27.8 percent of AI-generated recommendations, according to a recent research by SAS Institute and analyst IDC.”
Yet, the dividend for doing it right is staggering: organisations with the most robust frameworks for trustworthy AI are 15 times more likely to report a high return on their AI investments compared to those with the weakest practices. Progress is moving at a breakneck pace, with the region’s Trustworthy AI Index surging from 31.5 in 2025 to 58.3 in 2026—a dramatic leap of 26.8 index points, or approximately 85 percent. These findings stem from the new Data and AI Impact Report: The New Economics of Trust, an initiative by SAS Institute (Statistical Analysis System) built on research insights from IDC.
As AI integration deepens, questions surrounding autonomy and human oversight have taken centre stage across the Nordics. The shift in corporate priorities is stark: the share of Nordic organisations citing the management of autonomy and human oversight as a critical challenge skyrocketed from a mere 1.5 percent in 2025 to 34.2 percent in 2026. Concurrently, the region’s Business and Operational Impact Index climbed from 41.1 in 2025 to 50.4 in 2026, gaining 9.3 index points. These Nordic results clearly demonstrate that as organisations fortify their AI governance, their reported business impact grows in tandem. For Swedish and Nordic enterprises, the next frontier is translating high-level policies into boardroom practice. This requires clear accountability, human oversight, and rigid boundaries for autonomous AI behaviour. Organisations must possess the capability to understand, audit, and track the outputs generated by their AI systems, notes Josefin Rosén, an expert in trustworthy and ethical AI at SAS Institute and a member of the European Commission's AI Act Advisory Forum. The chasm between leaders and laggards in the trustworthy AI space is widening. Among organisations with the most sophisticated frameworks for responsible AI, 62 percent report that they yield at least double the returns on their AI investments, compared to a mere 4 percent among organisations with the weakest practices. When AI works as intended, it delivers tremendous impact. At the same time, it is well-documented that even the most advanced AI agents can exhibit error rates exceeding 25 percent when tackling complex tasks—a failure rate that is entirely unacceptable when dealing with decisions carrying significant real-world consequences. To achieve precision and repeatability, organisations must embed domain expertise into their AI-driven workflows while firmly keeping humans at the center of governance and oversight. The enterprises that succeed in this balancing act will bridge the gap between perceived trust and actual reliability, ultimately securing a distinct competitive advantage through AI, concludes Bryan Harris, CTO at SAS Institute.

As artificial intelligence gains greater autonomy, the mandate to understand and audit these systems becomes increasingly urgent. Globally, a lack of explainability or transparency stands as the primary reason users choose to override or disregard AI-driven recommendations. In the Nordic region, where users discard 27.8 percent of AI advice on average, this deficit in transparency is the leading culprit, closely followed by the system’s failure to fully account for contextual nuances.
”As AI moves toward higher autonomy, organizations face a profound new challenge: maintaining trust in systems that humans do not fully understand,” notes Chris Marshall, VP at IDC. ”Our findings indicate that robust oversight, explainability, accountability, and solid data foundations are becoming absolute imperatives for scaling AI successfully.”

Data Quality and Governance
Encouragingly, the Nordic region has improved its scores across all five core pillars used to measure trustworthy AI compared to 2025: data quality and governance, model management and oversight, explainability and fairness, responsible AI policies, and auditability and accountability. Yet, despite these strides, the region still lags behind global benchmarks in every single one of these five critical areas.
The Data and AI Impact Report: The New Economics of Trust is an initiative by SAS Institute, built on research insights from IDC. This extensive global study surveyed 2,699 decision-makers across 28 countries, all possessing deep knowledge of or influence over their organizations’ data and AI initiatives. The Nordic findings are derived from a weighted aggregate of data from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, representing 149 respondents in the region for 2026.

Key Takeaways: Five Essential Insights from the Report

  • A 15x Dividend on Returns: Enterprises with the most mature frameworks for trustworthy AI are 15 times more likely to report high returns. Specifically, 62 percent of these vanguard organizations achieve at least double the yield on their investments, compared to a mere 4 percent among their less-prepared peers.
  • A Resurgent Nordic Landscape: The region’s Trustworthy AI Index staged a massive year-over-year rally, climbing from 31.5 to 58.3—a 26.8-index-point surge that represents an approximate 85 percent increase.
  • The Transparency Deficit: A distinct lack of explainability remains the single greatest barrier to adoption, serving as the primary driver behind users overriding or rejecting AI-generated recommendations.
  • The Data Infrastructure Bottleneck: Legacy systems continue to hinder progress, with a striking 17.5 percent of global organizations possessing a fully optimized data infrastructure.
  • The Agentic AI Trust Deficit: Trust levels vary significantly by architecture. Globally, confidence stands at 76 percent for generative AI, but drops to 66 percent for agentic AI systems capable of autonomous execution.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Success Stories

Industriellt

Success Stories

Intressant på PLM TV News

Aktuell ANALYS

Aktuell Analys

Aktuell Analys

3D-printing

Block title